<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChiaTown&#187; Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chiatown.com/category/technology/other-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chiatown.com</link>
	<description>Technology and Business the way it should be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wishing the U.S. Patent Office Wasn&#8217;t So Slow</title>
		<link>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/08/04/wishing-the-us-patent-office-wasnt-so-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/08/04/wishing-the-us-patent-office-wasnt-so-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[losing competitive advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiatown.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard over and over again how painfully slow the U.S. Patent Office is. I was reminded again today as I was copied on an email to a patent attorney regarding an application we sent in THREE YEARS AGO. What the hell? This wasn&#8217;t even a very complex product that we are dealing with here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="height:100%;float:right;width:120px;overflow:hidden;margin:0 0 0 0;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2694017461574168";
/* chiatown vertical */
google_ad_slot = "7997547996";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><div style="height:100%;min-height:100%;overflow:auto;"><p>We&#8217;ve heard over and over again how painfully slow the U.S. Patent Office is. I was reminded again today as I was copied on an email to a patent attorney regarding an application we sent in THREE YEARS AGO. What the hell? This wasn&#8217;t even a very complex product that we are dealing with here. It&#8217;s a patch cord&#8230;a patch cord! How tough is it to examine past art (which we already did ourselves AND had patent attorneys work on) and determine if this simple product is patentable or not?</p>
<p>The discouraging thing is that in this day and time, business and technology moves along at a MUCH faster pace than it did even just a couple decades ago. Our product could be obsolete by the time this patent gets granted. Every month that goes by is tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of missed revenue.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve heard of the USPTO reforms that are supposed to be taking place. When will we actually see these changes? How many millions of dollars must be lost before the USPTO becomes an efficient machine? The economy of the U.S. would benefit from these changes and the U.S. would also become competitive in the international marketplace. Until these changes take place, thousands of good ideas will fail to make it to market at a relevant time, businesses will fail to have a chance to succeed, and our competitive advantage will continue to deteriorate.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/08/04/wishing-the-us-patent-office-wasnt-so-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire and Sprint Resume WiMax Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/01/30/clearwire-and-sprint-resume-wimax-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/01/30/clearwire-and-sprint-resume-wimax-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiatown.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a follow-up to my &#8220;stop screwing up so much Sprint&#8221; article recently posted. Evidently, Sprint Nextel and Clearwire are resuming talks to have their partnership for their ambitious WiMax project. This is pretty good news for both companies and for road warriors in general. WiMax is faster than the current cellular networks (even the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a follow-up to my &#8220;stop screwing up so much Sprint&#8221; article recently posted. Evidently, Sprint Nextel and Clearwire are resuming talks to have their partnership for their ambitious WiMax project. This is pretty good news for both companies and for road warriors in general. WiMax is faster than the current cellular networks (even the 3g networks) and if done correctly, will be a hell of a lot cheaper. Rumor has it that Intel (another WiMax backer&#8230;who also happens to have loads of money and loves R&amp;D) is interested in investing a bit in this venture. Nice!</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon Sprint&#8230;we can do this. You can&#8217;t do it alone. Neither can Clearwire. Together, you have a chance. Yes, you&#8217;ll be the first ones out there, investing loads in the infrastructure, making the newbie mistakes that others can learn from, but it also give you the lead if you manage this thing correctly. I want to see this.</p>
<p>Am I rooting for the underdog (compared to Verizon, AT&amp;T&#8230;)? I don&#8217;t think so. I simply see a great opportunity for them. I&#8217;d also love to see widespread WiMax adoption. I would love to see a time where I don&#8217;t have to find a hot-spot just to surf the web. So here&#8217;s to Clearwire and Sprint&#8230;this is your chance. Make the best of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chiatown.com/2008/01/30/clearwire-and-sprint-resume-wimax-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

